Field noteOct 23, 20262 min read1 source

How StackAI by Asana used Astra, Codex and Command to Reduce Browser Agent Costs

In one minute

StackAI, owned by Asana, reported changes to a browser agent intended to preserve prompt-cache reuse.

What changed: Same event as Asana cuts model costs 76x in browser tests with GPT-6.1 Sol

The agent had been caching its tools and system prompt, but it removed screenshots and trimmed older text on each step. Those edits changed the request prefix and prevented reuse of the growing history.

The team cached the history with a marker on the latest tool result, used batch screenshot pruning at a 20:1 ratio, and raised the history budget from 120,000 to 480,000 characters. The study tested six caching and history policies at two budgets on GPT-6.1 Sol and three unnamed frontier models. It comprised 144 runs, with three runs per condition, plus a 12-run follow-up.

StackAI reports that its best configuration was 29 times cheaper and four times faster than the production baseline on Model B. On GPT-6.1 Sol, it reports a 76-fold cost reduction, a fivefold speed increase, and 89% of input read from cache. The authors say every best-condition run found all 192 facts.

The source does not establish that these results transfer to other browser tasks, providers, or longer-running agents. Three tested models are unnamed, and the authors note that the run counts do not distinguish conditions separated by only a few percentage points.

Evidence / sources

  1. 1stackai.com/blog/how-stackai-by-asana-used-astra-codex-and-command-to-reduce-browser-agent-costs
All Field Notes

Next reads

Read next

Open the graph
  1. 01topicCodexExplore the codex topic hub.
  2. 02archiveField NotesOpen the latest editorial analysis.
  3. 03source ledgerSource LedgerInspect the public source evidence graph.
Who read this page?Machine requests, hidden until opened

Loading the privacy-safe route aggregate...

Open the JSON contract